
I made this picture as a self assignment for an NYIP photo class many years ago. The object was to use converging lines to lead the eye into an image. Although I had never visited the Wall before, I decided to check out the location. It was a perfect day to avoid crowds of tourists...wet, miserable and chilly. After looking at the possibilities, I set my camera on a tripod at the apex of the wall to capture the Washington Monument at the converging lines formed by the Wall and the sidewalk. Just as I was about to release the shutter, that lone visitor appeared from seemingly nowhere at the point of convergence. Sometimes I guess we just get lucky.
After I had captured the image and was preparing to leave, I turned to the left and there on Panel 1 of the Wall I saw the names of some of my aviation unit buddies from 1964-65, at eye level, right in front of me. The sight of those names brought on emotions that I had not expressed since the day they were killed in Vietnam. I have been back several times since then and am always overwhelmed by the tremendous loss those pieces of black granite represent.
Earlier this month another name was etched on the wall. The addition brings the number of names on the wall to 58,261.
Frank Z
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Memorial Day 2009
Friday, May 22, 2009
Another of Mama Shan's Outstanding Photoshop Tutorials
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Ramblings
In photography as art, what do we really mean by "original" anymore? It's pretty clear when you are talking about original or vintage prints made from the film negative of the masters of yesteryear. But does it even make a difference as to who makes the print or is it who made the image that is on the negative that results in an original photograph? I'm pretty sure there were prints made by master printers for photographers and not printed by the photographers themselves. Just as is the case of photogravures that were pulled by master artists, using original negatives, either with or without the photographer's guidance...such as this Jon Goodman gravure of Edward Steichen's "The Flatiron."
And then what about the future? There will come a time when there are no negatives in the process. Already has to some degree. Then what is the original...the raw file of 1s and 0s? Or the processed and converted file suitable for printing...or the first print made and signed by the photographer? Further, which file is the original...the one on your hard drive or the two or three exact duplicate backups of the file on removable media. I think a lot of my questions about this subject really started after seeing the Robert Frank exhibit at the National Gallery of Art recently. It was a great experience overall, but particularly to me, that we were able to see his marked up negatives as a first cut, then the printed contact sheets, then the 8x10s with his notes and crop lines pinned to a bulletin board and then finally those magnificent 83 prints that ended up in "The Americans." It dawned on me that future generations will not be able to experience being immersed in the step-by-step work of the photogs of today who will at some point become the masters of tomorrow.
What are your thoughts on the subject?
Frank
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Photo of the Month for January
Friday, December 5, 2008
Winter Wonderland
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Photo of the Month for September
My pick this month is a high-key portrait of a single Starburst lily. This bloom is just beginning to open into the beautiful and beautifully scented flower that it is.
A short video of a flowering Starburst lily can be seen here.
For a gallery view of this print, click on the image.
Best always,
Frank
Monday, August 25, 2008
Queen of the Night (Part 2...



(Click on photo for gallery view)
Saturday, August 9, 2008
This Was Fun (And took a lot of work!)
I put a layer of the first leaf over a background of the second leaf then blended to form a new image.
Photo of the Month for August

By now, if you have witnessed my obsession with creating images of flowers, plants and trees; you will know that one of my favorite subjects is the Southern Magnolia. I tend to concentrate my work on the flowers themselves, however, inspired by some of my favorite photo artists, I decided to try and create images from the beautiful shape and form of the leaves. As an example of images that have inspired me, see the work of Ruth Bernhard and Imogen Cunningham. The sepia toning of this leaf was inspired by Joyce Tenneson's Flower Portraits.
I welcome your comments.
Frank
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Photoshop Mama's Colorization Concept
Posted below are three more of Mama Shan’s Photoshop tutorials. They should be viewed in the order in which they have been posted because each tutorial builds on the techniques covered in the prior video.







